Bob Hudson
Archaeology Department, University of Sydney, Australia
Archaeology Department, University of Sydney, Australia
Recent
 archaeological excavations and surveys at the old Arakanese sites of 
Dhanyawadi, Vesali and Mrauk-U raise new issues about each. It appears 
that Dhanyawadi is not the eccentric shape portrayed in early 
archaeological plans, but an oval site with some notable similarities to
 the walled Pyu sites of Upper Myanmar. Vesali shares one of these 
characteristics, an inward-curving brick gate. A radiocarbon date, the 
first for Vesali, intriguingly places another city gate in the 13th 
cenhtry AD. A review of the huge earth banks that surround Mrauk-U 
suggests that the popular notion that these were defensive may be a 
romanticised interpretation of what was essentially a water management 
system.
Location  
The
 early polities of Arakan were located in the valleys of the Kaladan and
 Lemro  Rivers. While some traditional accounts locate early 
settlements, "royal capitals", as far north as the Kyaukpandaung plateau
 (Tun Shwe Khiae 1992: 20-21) the available evidence points to the 
alluvial lowlands, 
 
 
 
Satellite
 imagery (Figure 1) shows how restricted the area available for 
irrigated rice agriculture was. The old settlements occupy a strip of 
land that is only between 15 and 35 kilometres wide, and perhaps 60 
kilometres from north to south. To the north, west and east are hills, 
and to the south the combined deltas of the two rivers meet the sea.
Dhanyawadi
There
 are traditional claims in Arakan of royal capitals dating back to 3000 
BC (Tun Shwe Khine 1992: 20). However the historical record begins with 
the c. AD 729 Anacandra inscription which describes how the founding 
king of the Candra Dynasty, Dvancandra (c. 370-425 AD), "built a city 
adorned by surrounding walls and a moat" (Johnston 1944; Gutman 1976: 
63, Vol I). This is Dhanyawadi, whose Gupta-period sculptures point to 
the 5th century AD (Gutman 2001: 29). It is the home of the Mahamuni 
shrine, an important pilgrimage site for Buddhists (Forchhammer 1892; 
Tun Shwe Khine 1994). The shrine is pretty much in the geographical 
centre of an oval outer wall which encloses an area of 5.6 square 
kilometres. Southwest of the shrine is a relatively square enclosed 
area, with another square series of walls inside it (Figure 2). 
 
 
 
These
 two sets of inner walls are generally interpreted as a palace. Apart 
from the walls themselves, and a couple of small brick structures, there
 are few brick foundations evident, suggesting that if this area 
enclosed an elite centre, then the inhabitants must have lived mainly in
 wooden structures built directly on the ground. Excavations on the 
eastern side show the walls curving inward to form a corridor, providing
 a narrow entranceway to the complex. These walls,like the outer city 
walls, are several metres thick, faced with brick, and filled with 
rubble (Kyaw Zan 2004).
One
 thing that immediately strikes the observer on seeing the curved brick 
gate is the similarity with curved brick corridor gates that have been 
excavated at Halin, Beikthano and Sriksetra (Aung Myint 1998). We seem 
to have no written information from ancient times to tell us just why 
the gates were built in this shape. Was their function defence against 
enemies, administrative (perhaps for the collection of taxes as people 
went through- some of the Upper Burma gates had niches that could have 
housed guards or officials) or cultural, to ensure that only members of 
the community that owned the walled city could enter? Until now, this 
kind of entranceway had appeared unique to First Miliennium AD Upper 
Myanmar, but it now seems that the ancient architects must have 
exchanged a few ideas across the Arakan Yoma.
Several
 important features came to light during field survey in 2005. The 
author, U Nyein Lwin, of the Archaeology Department in Mrauk-U and U 
Maung Maung Than, a staff member of the Mahamuni museum who was raised 
in the local area, undertook a program of "ground-truthing", directly 
checking features that had previously been mapped or detected from 
aerial photos or satellite imagery. A key discovery was that the huge 
earth banks to the southeast of the Mahamuni, which have appeared on 
maps as part of the outer city wall, form quite a separate feature, They
 very likely became incorporated into the archaeological plan due to a 
misinterpretation of aerial photographs (Thin Kyi 1970) and were 
cheerfully accepted as giving the city an inexplicably eccentric outline
 by subsequent scholars, including the author (Gutman & Hudson 2004:
 162). However inspection on the ground shows that there are brick 
remains in a field between the earth banks which form a continuous line 
with brick walls that run under the earthworks (Figure 2). The earth 
bank, sometimes known as the "gold and silver road", has more than one 
folk tale attached to it. In one story, it was a twin road to Mrauk-U. 
In another, it was an artificial lake built by rival royals to hold boat
 races. Its walls are now breached, and crops are grown on its floor.
Other
 finds fiom the ground survey include a curved brick gate on the outer 
east wall and a stone quarry, characterised by the remains of drill 
holes in the grey sandstone, at Kyauktalon, beyond the west wall. The 
early sculptures of Dhanyawadi and Vesali largely employ red sandstone, 
so the Kyauktalon quarry cannot be claimed as a source for these 
artworks. Outside the southern part of the outer wail we located a 
cluster of brick and/or stone platforms, typically about 8 metres 
square. They appear as low mounds on the ground. Many are preserved as 
field corners, presumably too hard to plough and too dense to make it 
worth the effort of removing the brick or stone. Perhaps they are 
religious monuments or graves. Careful excavation of one or two of them 
may provide valuable new information.
Vesali
Art
 history and numismatic studies place Vesali between perhaps the 6th and
 10th centuries AD (Nyunt Han 1984; Gutman 2001: 41). It is enclosed by a
 brick wall, with an area of 6.2 square kilometres. Excavations in the 
1980s revealed several brick buildings.
Regular
 finds of stone and bronze artifacts were noted then (Nyunt Han 1984) 
and since (Shwe Zan 1995). An inner walled area, known as the “palace 
site", is obscured by the present village of Wethali, although brick 
remains are widely seen in the village pathways and roads. Recent 
excavations have unearthed a curved brick gateway on the northern side 
of the outer wall, which can be seen where the road to Dhanyawadi 
crosses the wall (Figure 3, VSL 8). 
 
 
 
This
 curved gate appears to have been overbuilt by later structures (Kyi 
Khin 2004), suggesting long-term use of the site. In the northwest 
corner, a different kind of gate was excavated, a gap in the wall with a
 large timber post set at each side (VSL 6). One of these posts has been
 radiocarbon dated to the period between AD 1260-1400 at 95.4% 
probability (sample OZH970, 670~40 BP, Australian Nuclear Science and 
Technology Organisation 2005). We should not rush to judgement on the 
basis of a single radiocarbon date, but at face value, the result 
suggests we should at least not discount some kind of construction 
activity in a period that had previously been considered to be well 
after the time the city was occupied. Vesali has been called in the 
Arakanese chronicles the "city of stone stairs" (Gutman 1976: 21; Nyunt 
Han 1984). Local people point out a section of the bank of the Rann 
Chaung about 500 metres fiom VSL 6 where they say stonework has been 
seen, but none is visible today.
Mrauk-U
The
 Mrauk-U period went from the 15th to 18th centuries AD, and seems to 
have been preceded by settlement activity along the Lemro River to the 
east in several centres including Sambawak/Pyinsa, Parein, Hkrit and 
Launggret (Harvey 1925: 137-149, 370-371; Thin Kyi 1970; the Lemro sites
 were recently re-surveyed by Berliet 2004: 234-239). A characteristic 
view of Mrauk-U is that the earth banks that surround particularly the 
eastern part of the city were constructed for defence, a maze 
"calculated to baffle any enemy", with the capacity for the waters of 
the town's reservoirs to be let loose to drown invaders (Collis 1923: 
246). A new look at these earth banks, using maps (Burma One Inch 84 
H/2), aerial photographs (thanks to Dr Elizabeth Moore for supplying a 
rare copy of a World War II aerial photo of Mrauk-U from the 
Williams-Hunt Collection at SOAS) and satellite imagery (LandSat 2000 
and IKONOS 1 metre) suggests rather erratic planning if defence was the 
main aim (Figure 4).

 The earth banks of Mrauk-u cover an area of more than 20 square 
kilometres. They extend more than 6 kilometres to the northeast of the 
citadel, as far as the Lemro River. However to the southeast, they are 
effectively on the edge of the city, except for banks fionting low hills
 that encircle an alluvial plain. It does not really look like a 
militarily viable fortification. There seems to be at least one large 
gap through which invaders could comfortably march, along a stream 
between the northern and southern groups of earth banks and past the 
Koe-thaung and Pizi-taung pagodas (Figure 4). There is also the question
 of the structurally similar earthworks at Dhanyawadi. It is difficult 
to attribute a defensive function to the Dhanyawadi banks, which form a 
single reservoir backing on to a hillside catchment area (Figure 2). We 
might look to water management as a more likely reason for the 
construction of the earthworks at both sites, to keep the saline water 
firom the surrounding tidal rivers and creeks at bay and permit rice 
irrigation. The Mrauk-U kings are described as building extensive bunds 
for water retention as far as the Lemro River in the mid-15th century 
(Smart 1917: 66-67).
It
 must be admitted that in the case of an attack, the complex systenl of 
banks and tanks would have favoured the locals rather than the 
intruders. Fortified lookout posts, some with gun ports, remain on the 
hills around the town (Tun Shwe Khine 1992; Shwe Zan 1995). These 
fortifications, along with the walls, gates and different kinds of earth
 banks, are given individual names in the local tradition, a tradition 
which considers the earth banks to be fundamentally defensive 
(Department of Archaeology n.d.). Histories describe how King Minbin, in
 the16th century, opened the sluices of the reservoirs to hold back 
Burmese/Peguan invaders (Harvey 1925: 140, 158). However wars are 
irregular occurrences, while agriculture is constant.The dramatic notion
 of drowningone's enemies by flooding the city's defences, a story told 
also of Beikthano (ASB 1905-06: 7), may be more appealing than the 
notion of a hydraulic engineering project, but the original construction
 of the earth banks should be seen as a creative approach to a difficult
 problem of water management that helped bring to Mrauk-u the prosperity
 that made it attractive over the years to adventurers from both inside 
and outside the society.This is not to suggest that the banks may not 
have been useful in the defence of the city,rather that any defensive 
advantage they may have given would have been the fortunate consequence 
of earIier decisions regarding water management.
References
ASB     1906-1965
 Report oS the Superintendent, Archaeological Survey of Bunna, Rangoon, 
Office of the Superintendent, Government Printing
Aung Myint      1998
 Site Characteristics of Pyu and Pagau ruins: A Comparative Study of the
 Dry Aeras in Southeast Asia: International Seminar, Kyoto, Japan.
Berliet, Emelle             2004
 Geographie Historique et Urbanisation en Birmanie et ses Pays Voisins, 
des origins (IIe s. av JC) a la fin du XIII siecle. Doctoral Thesis, 
Ecole Doctorale Sciences Humaines et Sociales, Universite Lumiere, Lyon 
II
Collis, M.S       1923 "The Golden City of Mrauk-U" Journal of the Burma Research Society 13(3), 244-256.
Department of Archaeology n.d           A
 Brief Presentarion of Cultural Heritage Sites in Rakhine Stare (undated
 mimeograph), Department of Archaeology, Ministry of Culture, Union 
ofMyanmar.
Forchhammer, E          1892 Reporr on the antiquities of Arakan: The Archaeology Department, Burma.
Gutman, Pamela         1976 Ancient Arakan, with special reference to its cultural History between the 5th and 11th centuries. PhD thesis. Australian National University,Canberra.
http://thesis.au:Nthesis.anu.edu.au/public/adt-ANU20050901.112732/index.html
Gutman, Pamela         2001 Burma'sLost Kingdoms: Splendours of Arakan Orchid Press.
Gutman, Pamela & Bob Hudson          2004
 The Archaeology of Burma, from the Neolithic to Pagan. Sourheast Asia: 
from prehistory to histoiy. I. Glover & P. Bellwood. Abingdon & 
New York, Routledge Curzon: 149-176.
Harvey, G. E.                1925 History of Burma Frank Cass & Co Ltd, London.
Johnston, E.H.  1944 "Some Sanskrit inscriptions of Arakan." BSOAS 21: 357-385.
Kyaw Zan         2004
 Report on Excavation at Ancient Dhanyawadi (Inrerim Departmental 
Report, in Burmese),Ministry of Culture, Department of Archaeology, 
Archaeological Branch Office, Rakhine State.
Kyi Khin           2004
 Excavation Report on Mounds VSL-6, VSL-7 and VSL-8 in Ancient Vesali 
(Interim Departmental Report, in Bumese), Ministry of Culture, 
Department of Archaeology, Archaeological Branch Office, Rakhine State.
Nyunt Han        1984 The study of Ancient City Vesali (Departmental Report,in Burmese). Yangon, Department of Archaeology.
Shwe Zan        1995 The Golden Mrauk-U, an ancient capital of Rakhine U Shwe Zan, Yangon.
Smart, R.B.      1917 Burma Gazetteer, Akyab District, Volume A Superintendent, Government Printing and Stationery, Union of Burma, Rangoon.
Thin Kyi, Daw  1970"Arakanese capitals: a preliminary survey of their geographical siting." Journal of the Burma Research, society 53(2). 1-13.
Tun Shwe Khine          1992 A guide to Mrauk-U, an ancient city of Rakhine, Myanmar U TunShwe.
Tun Shwe Khine          1994 A guide to Mahamuni: the highly venerated golden image of
Buddha with authentic long history Rakhine Book Series.
# Maps are by the author and this research is supported by a grant and postdoctoral Fellowship from Australian ResearchCouncil.
| < Prev | Next > | 
|---|
 
No comments:
Post a Comment